The Year in Review: Movies of
2005
Andrew Prince / Reviewer
It was a very good year in movies, perhaps the best year so
far this decade. I have been wondering for a few years now if
our best filmmakers would take advantage of the events and
emotions going on in our country and our world, to create
great works that would either serve as a commentary on our
times or as a lesson for the future.
This was the year I had been waiting for? a year in which
many movies either captured the recent tones of America and
her people, taught us a lesson relevant to our times, or
simply provided us with great entertainment.
The best movie I saw this year was Steven Spielberg's
"Munich," about the aftermath of the killing of 11
Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics in Munich. Some critics
said it was anti-Jewish, others said it was anti-Palestinian
and others condemned the movie for not taking a side at all.
In my opinion,"Munich" is not prejudiced against
either group and tells both sides of the story while trying
to argue that acts of vengeance don't get anybody
anywhere. There are some great sequences in the film apart
from its lessons and they are all handled with masterful
cadence by Spielberg.
Stephen Haghan's politically charged "Syriana"
is a great movie about the oil industry. The film was
disliked by many who could not keep up with the plot. For
these people there is good news: you are not supposed to
follow the plot. Roger Ebert said people are supposed to be
surrounded by it.
"Syriana" does not try to explain the oil industry
to the audience because the characters themselves do not
understand the oil industry. Many would attack this film as
too liberal, but the active viewer will realize that the film
is apolitical because everyone in it is guilty for one reason
or another. Haghan creates a fractured, entertaining tale
that has great performances and writing, including a great
speech by Tim Blake Nelson defending corruption.
Maybe the most powerful and most important film of the year
was Paul Haggis' "Crash." This is a film that
still has me thinking about how I, and other people, view
those who are not of the same race, religion or ethnicity.
The film's characters say things that real people only
think to themselves, making it almost as hard to listen to as
"The Passion of the Christ" is to watch. At first,
the characters seem to be racist or the opposite, but as the
movie goes on, coincidences in the story reveal that these
same characters are not as bad, or good, as they first
appeared.
Aside from these great and serious films, Hollywood also
gave us some of the best entertainment in a while this year.
"Batman Begins"surprised me with its dramatic value
while being thoroughly entertaining, making it the best of
the Batman pictures.
"King Kong" had great action sequences that, even
if they didn't make much sense, were so fun I didn't
care about anything else. There are very few, if any, dull
moments in this 187 minute movie.
"Star Wars: Episode III" proved to be the best of
the prequels by cutting down on the boring political dialogue
and returning to the space opera that made the first three
pictures so good. The scene where Anakin Skywalker transforms
into Darth Vader will stay with me for quite some time. It
was a great Greek tragedy and great trash.
Normally, a critic will see around 250 films a year, but I
have seen a tenth of that or less this year. Some other
movies I would love to see that were released in 2005 are:
"Brokeback Mountain," "Good Night, and Good
Luck," "Chronicles of Narnia,"
"Capote," "Lord of War" and many others.
This was not the best year for individual movies.
"Memento" (2001), "Minority Report"
(2002), "City of God" (2003), "Kill Bill Vol.
2" (2004) and "Million Dollar Baby" (2004) are
all better than any film that I have seen recently.
But this year was more balanced and had far fewer bad films
than any other year so far this decade. I feel honored that
2005 was my first year as a film critic.
Contact Andrew Prince at pendulum@elon.edu or
278-7247.
|