Front Page
Send Let to Editor
Advertising Info
Archives
Staff
Submit an Organization Brief


End of the World Part IV

“It’s the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.” -R.E.M.

 

Jonathan Chapman / Columnist

In the past century we have survived six major wars, numerous conflicts, hundreds of scandals and international tension that has spanned the better part of 50 years. But a new war has begun, one that breaks all previous boundaries and finds its way into our own personal homes. Every day, I arm myself with my right index finger. It carries the arrow on my computer over the red 'x' at the top of the window. I click. One pop-up ad down, 9,999,999 to go.

Every day, Internet users fight through hundreds of pop-ups, shooting them down almost as soon as they appear. Double clicking on the Internet icon on my desktop, I begin to brace myself for the impending bombardment [pop] of these horrible windows of annoyance. At first, I navigate in peace, checking my e-mail. Then, I make the move they were waiting for — I check my Hotmail account.

Suddenly, I am in the midst of a war zone. One comes in on the right. There’s another on the left. Then from the bottom. Then they drop the big one — an ad pops up and shakes at me! I can handle an advertisement or two, but when one shows up and starts shaking at me, my patience drops to zero. I click in rage. First here, then there. My anger builds until I finally succumb to the ads and close my browser with complete and total abandon. The companies won that battle.

And the thing is, the companies win all the battles.

Maybe I’m totally off target, but these companies that sponsor such advertisements must realize the war zone they have created by bringing these pop-ups into our homes. So my question is, why are these companies purposely making my (and the rest of the world's) Internet experience miserable? Do they have it out for anyone who connects to the World Wide Web?

Perhaps I am over analyzing. Lets look at this logically.

Companies make money by selling products or services. They are able to sell such products and services by advertising. I learned that in eighth-grade economics.

What they didn’t teach me in eighth-grade economics is that the most effective way of advertising is to annoy the [pop] out of Internet users.

Let’s face it, the last time I wanted to get someone’s attention, the first thing I thought to do was to take out massive amounts of pop-up windows to grab my target’s precious [pop] time. Obviously, this irritating scheme of complete pop-up immersion is working because every time I log onto the Web, more and more ads appear.

This revelation leads me to my next [pop] question: Who are the Einsteins who keep clicking on these maddening windows? I don’t know any, at least I hope I don’t, because I might just be forced to sever all ties with them. Maybe complete alienation is too harsh, [pop] but I will most definitely be forced to rethink our relationship.

Perhaps the [pop] problem doesn’t lie in those who continuously click these exasperating pop-ups. Why should we punish the people who [pop] have fallen prey to the evils of diabolical ads? Instead, we should create a blacklist of companies that use pop-ups.

First appearance on the list, they are considered a low threat — a [pop] warning is sent to the company [pop] encouraging them to stop using pop-up ads as a means of advertising.

If a day passes and [pop] it has yet to react to the initial warning, it will be subject to a slightly less tolerable response. The companies [pop] behind the annoying advertisements [pop] will be placed on the “second strike list.”

This list leads to restriction of Web site size and accessibility for a specific amount of time. The extent of this punishment will be determined by a specially created tribunal that would handle all inadequacies concerning Internet advertising.

The third strike [pop] warrants more aggressive action.

Webmasters [pop], publicists and, depending on the severity of the offense, CEOs, will be arrested and submitted [pop] for research helping to analyze the [pop] effects of the excessive [pop] viewing of pop-up ads.

Perhaps this [pop] scheme is a [pop] little unrealistic. Maybe the [pop] advertisers don’t realize the hateful emotions some Internet users [pop] are beginning to harbor for their companies. Whatever the case, the pop-ups are going [pop] to have to stop before [pop] we [pop] all [pop] go [pop] insane. [pop]

Jonathan Chapman