
nline medical resources will not account
for this. Health policy will be required. Technology is
not a technology issue - it is a social issue - online
technology will only codify current health policy that
fragments care and underserves a significant minority
of the American population. Real reform, including
finance reform, is needed, which will result in
cost-reduction, facilitated by online access. - Ted
Eytan, MD, Group Health Cooperative
nline medical resources could certainly
have a substantial impact on health care, particuarly
in diagnosis, consultation, coordination. Certain types
of mistakes could be lessened. But it is not likely to
have a substantial impact on health costs, coverage,
malpractice suits or access. Those needs require other
avenues to remedy. - Benjamin M. Compaine, editor
of "The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or
Creating a Myth?" and coauthor of "Who Owns
the Media?"
ot a chance. The financing mechanism
guarantees higher costs. - Fred Hapgood, Output
Ltd.
he internet could fill a huge vacuum in
health care - the institutions are already weakened,
the needs are critical, the demands are increasing -
the time is ripe! - Christine Geith, University of
Michigan
his may take more than ten years to
accomplish, but it will happen. Much of our interaction
with doctors involves talking to them - describing
symptoms and events, etc. - and they give us advice,
assurance, and guidance and prescriptions. That
doesn't have to happen in a physical office. This
will all start with standardized, digital medical
records, easily accessibly by medical personnel. Then
email exchanges between a doctor and patient, including
routine prescriptions, scheduling, referrals and
follow-up. Eventually, real-time video conferencing
(like Apple's iChat) will permit
"virtual" office visits, coupled in some
cases with remote-sensing monitoring of vital functions
such a blood pressure, pulse, temperature, etc. In the
longer term, the internet will be able to keep more of
the elderly out of nursing homes for a longer time:
at-home patient care will be made possibly by remote
monitoring ... If truly "big broadband" gets
into enough homes, at the right price, it can enable
enormous savings in health/nursing home costs for
society as the baby boom generation ages. - Gary
Bachula, Internet2
ccess to medical information is a good
thing and is already happening. But there are strong
forces afoot to suppress information or access to
non-FDA approved services. For example, there are bills
in Congress to remove all vitamin supplements from the
marketplace and make limited amounts of supplements
available by prescription only. If this happens,
people's medical choices will decrease and chronic
illness will increase because people won't be able
to maintain healthy preventative practices. - Peter
Denning, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey,
Calif./columnist for Communications of the
ACM
he entrenched silos of health care are
huge, and the Internet alone cannot take this on, even
as people get empowered with better medical knowledge.
- Barry Wellman, University of Toronto
oo many people will use the Internet as
fodder for becoming more demanding, more expensive
health-care consumers. - Alexandra Samuel, Harvard
University/Cairns Project (New York Law
School)
see a growth of misinformation on the
Internet and the problem of people getting conflicting
information regarding medical conditions not fully
understood or on which physicians and scientists
differ. People will be more informed about medical
conditions but not necessarily better informed or
better able to make decisions. Medicine is not a good
place for autodidacts. - Stanley Chodorow,
University of California at San Diego/Council on
Library and Information Sciences
agree with this. With increased access
to relevant health information, better decisions will
be made by health-care consumers and providers, there
will be better access to relevant health care advice,
and consumers will have access to greater peer support.
- Gary Kreps, George Mason University/National
Cancer Institute
think this is essentially true, but I am
not convinced that technology in healthcare will either
decrease costs or increase access to care for the
disadvantaged. I think technology will go a long way
toward improving the care and the level of service that
is delivered, and I have hopes for President Bush's
EHR initiative. But I am not yet convinced, because of
the costs of building and maintaining computerized
networks and the software and devices needed to run on
it, that the costs themselves will go anywhere but up.
And as more people lose insurance, this will make care
even more difficult to obtain, IT or no IT. - Kevin
Featherly, news editor, Healthcare Informatics,
McGraw-Hill Healthcare Publishing
his is very much a moving target. As
medicine itself advances at an unprecedented speed, the
demands on the system are likely to continue to
outstrip their adequate provision. - A. Halavais,
State University of New York at Buffalo
do research in the field of online
health, and I wish it were this simple. External
barriers (such as
legal/regulatory/reimbursement/organizational) still
trump many efficiencies offered by the Internet. -
Pamela Whitten, Michigan State University
he biggest challenge to health
information is separating the reliable wheat from the
uninformed or mercenary chaff. Too often, when I search
on a disease, my first hits are sites that want to sell
me a miracle cure. (Would it were so.) On the other
hand, the biggest gain from the Internet is the
abundance of health information I can access online.
- Barry Wellman, University of Toronto
expect improvements, but not necessarily
dramatic ones here. The privacy issues will be a major
obstacle until (and even after) widespread
authentication exists. - Terry Pittman, America
Online, Broadband Division
mprovements will be driven by HMOs and
insurers. Improvements in customer service, access, and
similar patient-centered concerns - to the extent they
occur - will be fortunate byproducts rather than
primary concerns. Some dramatic improvements that could
readily be achieved - such as online consultations for
common ailments with physicians who have not previously
met the patient in person - will be forestalled or
eliminated by physician-interest groups. - Lois
Ambash, Metforix Inc.
edical mistakes and malpractice will
still happen. People will have access to more
information to challenge decisions. The Internet will
also allow better research of doctor records to prevent
it. Certainly admin. Functions may be better dealt with
online. Information is half the medical challenge and
the Internet will help facilitate its dissemination
more efficiently. - Jonathan Peizer, CTO, Open
Society Institute
nline medical resources will have next
to no effect on the delivery of adequate medical care
to all. A political solution is required, and throwing
technology at the population won't fix a
fundamentally flawed system. - Rose Vines,
freelance tech writer, Australian PC User and Sydney
Morning Herald
o long as the poor, the old, and the
minorities are less connected than the wealthy and
educated, we cannot expect to dramatically influence
the health system, whose highest users are from the
same disadvantaged groups. - Tobey Dichter,
Generations on Line
ele-medicine is already having a
significant impact on remote communities. Streamlined
insurance processing, elimination of prescription
mistakes, better and confidential accessibility to
records including longer-term archiving (medical
imaging, test results) are all on the way to improving
health care - though there are still hurdles to
overcome (e.g. getting the insurance companies to
cooperate). - Ezra Miller, Ibex Consulting
can see the Internet perhaps improving
customer service and some rural access to medical
expertise. But I can't see how this will lead to
lower health-care costs, less medical mistakes or more
medical care for Americans. These problems are systemic
and not related to technology. They are political.
- Mark Glaser, Online Journalism Review/Online
Publishers Association
he Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality has put a lot of funding toward research in
health information technology with the goal of
improving patient safety. While technology is not a
panacea for eliminating medical errors, it can automate
some error-prone processes. Recent research shows that
it can introduce previously unheard of errors, as well,
so caution is warranted. Rising costs could be slowed
and customer service improved by the efficiency of
online medical resources. Access to health care through
long distance consultations with specialists will
increase as telemedicine becomes e-medicine. -
Elizabeth W. Staton, University of Colorado at Denver
Health Sciences Center
ost developed countries are aging fast.
Having more online resources will help them but
can't prevent the actual care that has to be given
to a growing number of elderly and therefore costs will
still rise. I do think the people will be better
informed so the doctors have to give their best care
possible before they 'shop' somewhere else.
- Egon Verharen, innovation manager, SURFnet (Dutch
Natl Ed & Research Network)
e are already finding the internet
useful as a cheap way to distribute life-saving or
promoting information and services to far-flung areas.
Believe that there may be some (not a lot) of savings
that can be put into other programs. - Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for
Infectious Diseases
uch systems will be vulnerable to abuse
(hacking, security and privacy invasions). -
Bornali Halder, World Development Movement
his is far too optimistic. Some
improvement will ensue, particularly in the areas of
customer service, information sharing and eventually
with remote surgery (i.e., one seasoned surgeon walking
a remote, less-experienced surgeon through a procedure
live). However, serious attention needs to be paid to
privacy concerns now, or a backlash of mistrust could
prevent people from going to doctors for fear of having
their illness made public. - Peter W. Van Ness, Van
Ness Group
t's not the ability for patients to
look up information on their own that will
revolutionize health care. It's the development of
a single patient record that can be shared by all of a
person's health care providers providing them with
new context for suggesting options for treatment and
prevention. It improves the cost, service and mistake
factors, but would do nothing to provide health care
for Americans who cannot afford it. That is a matter of
political will, not technology. - Aaron Osterby,
State of South Australia, Department of
Health
he transformation of medicine is coming
- the dire situation we have now will make it
inevitable. It will be a tough paradigm shift to make,
but new generations of medical practitioners will bring
it with them. - John B. Mahaffie, Leading Futurists
LLC
And the following are from predictors who
chose to remain anonymous: [Workplaces of respondents
whose reactions are listed below include Harvard
Medical School, eHealth Institute, Geffen School of
Medicine at UCLA, Weill Medical College/Cornell
University, U.S. Administration on Aging, Gartner, The
Aspen Institute, Microsoft, Harvard University, Proteus
Foundation, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,
Penn State University, South East England Development
Agency, U.S. Congressional Budget Office, Carnegie
Mellon, Discern LLC, RAND, University of California at
Santa Barbara, University of Minnesota, University of
Washington, Renaissance Health/Massachusetts General
Hospital, Texas A&M University, Northwestern
University, Merck, Center for Digital Government,
Metafacts, People Who, Information Week, Hamline
University of Law, Bowling Green State University,
Ventureramp and others.]
Forget this. We have a conspiracy of all the
bureuacrats who need their jobs. Hospitals need to push
paper to get their cost structure up. Insurance,
likewise. We are in a deadly embrace.
The next ten years will be marked by a series of
disasters regarding the uses of ill-thought-through
technologies (e-health, telemedicine), and insurance
costs will be so high that government intervention will
be needed. It will be common to have been injured by a
failed IT-in-medicine system. There will be a strong
counter-movement to humanize medicine.
Sadly, this field will continue to be a laggard.
Health care in the United States is likely to get
progressively more expensive, less affordable, less
available to those who need it, and more plagued with
mistakes.
A series of structural changes in
the insurance and health care industries must be made
to break down the barriers to making such online
resources truly useful. Whether or not the Congress and
the interested industries have the courage to make
those changes is another question.
Medical care costs are driven by the need to fund
improvements in technology and these will continue to
grow at 5-10% in excess of inflation. As a result, IT
improvements may improve the standard of care and
reduce mistakes but they are unlikely to tame the rise
in costs. Also, rapidly rising costs are likely to
leave excellent medical care the exclusive right of the
wealthy.
May be wishful thinking, but I am hopeful this will be
the biggest area of internet advance.
Medicine is the last big entity that has not
completely adopted IT practices. Care will become more
"virtual" ... and this will increase its
availability, lower its cost, and if all goes well,
limit hospitals/clinics to only times when they are
really needed.
No, rising costs of health care are not going to be
solved by more information; we might even see more
rapidly rising costs as patients demand more and more
expensive interventions they have encountered
online.
Good records management will be the #1 improvement,
though the internet and online is only a small part of
that.
The healthcare industry has been traditionally and
dishearteningly slow to invest the capital in
technology development. Four percent vs. over 10% in
retail environment.
Certainly customer service in health care will change.
Costs will not decrease. Malpractice concerns need tort
reform not online resources. Perception of access might
change; actual access is a political issue.
But those problems will still be there.
Bad data will still yield bad results!
Lawyer-driven, risk-avoidance medicine will continue
to prevail.
Disparities in access will probably increase without
significant public investment, which is
unlikely. The benefits of any technological
advances may be negated by timeless constants. While
some surgical techniques may be improved or automated,
and less-educated doctors may learn better treatment
protocols online, the bulk of the work still comes down
to doctors' ability to spend adequate time with
patients and use the best medicines, technology and
treatment at hand. The rise of malpractice has turned
it into a less-lucrative profession, which may limit
the numbers of new doctors certified each year.
Consumer preferences for health care will likely cause
the share of GDP and the federal budget accounted for
by healthcare to increase.
There will be a downside in more litigation, as
ordinary people gain access to more knowledge about
medical conditions, which makes them educated, but
insufficiently expert. "A little knowledge is a
dangerous thing."
Strong forces in medical and pharmaceutical and
insurance sectors may affect this process more than
Internet's capabilities. Complete or at least
massive overhaul of health care infrastructure,
including and reflecting Internet role, is necessary
for this prediction to materialize. Electronic medical treatment has
been around for more than a decade. Without the
investment of huge amounts for remote diagnostic
equipment and video networks, it's unlikely that
there would be much real change in care. More
information is and will be available, but actual
treatment is declining overall.
The increasing pressure to see more patients etc.,
will only continue. There is little use for more
resources of information if no one has time to refer to
them in the course of ordinary care. In addition, the
rise in automation and self-serve options (such as we
see in self checkout lanes at supermarkets) is training
our society not to rely on service from other human
beings. My sense is that it is likely that patients
will increasingly use the internet to act as their own
doctor, coming to their physician with not only
complaints but "solutions," the quality of
which will be suspect.
If better health information follows to patients, I
can see these improvements being made. But will HMOs or
other institutions control the information flow?
Healthcare may improve, but moving services online
will certainly not reduce health-care costs or poor
customer service, mistakes or malpractice claims.
The Internet will hardly be a silver bullet for
personal-injury lawyers and the lawsuits - nor will
simply overlaying a technology onto a legacy culture of
poor service yield a sudden surge in warmth,
compassion, and customer service. Technology is not a
panacea for a broken culture.
Efficiency is another benefit of the internet, as is
sharing of best-practices and record-keeping,
comparative analysis, second opinions.
Only with government intervention and encouragement.
The profit motive is too seductive for it to happen on
its own.
Communication is a tiny proportion of the cost of
medical treatment. How can reducing this tiny fraction
of the cost (and that's, in essence, what the
Internet is about) alter the big picture?
As an HR professional, this will only happen if the
insurance companies (and especially BCBS) will invest
money in their equipment, their programs, and their
people. With dummies at the helm of the claims
processing, it won't change, and customer service
will be a challenging experience for consumers. Medical
research will definitely be enhanced and virtual
operations will help in rural areas, provided that they
have the equipment to handle the newer
technologies.
The Internet will make a large difference in the way
that people access medical care. They will be much more
likely to look up information on conditions and
alternative care techniques. But it is hard to see how
this will reduce cost, improve service or lead to
significant reduction in malpractice.
I am not confident that the Internet will make a
meaningful difference in the overall health care system
- the problems there are deep-rooted and structural.
However, there will be many individual success stories
of the benefits of online health.
While the medical community has successfully resisted
a major IT overhaul, I see it as inevitable, given the
rising costs and changing demographics in the
U.S.
This is possible, but not likely in all areas due to
many legal problems, technology access problems,
identity and privacy issues, regulations, etc.
While the Internet will continue to be a source of
medical information, thus empowering patients more than
ever, it can't do much for the U.S. health care
system as a whole.
I think the major problems here are social, not
technical. We can already do most of the things
suggested here with current capabilities, but there is
no evidence that the large-scale social changes that
would be necessary to enable these improvements are
going to be addressed any time soon. The problems seem
to be getting worse, not better.
Other health problems may arise from the self-care,
self-serve consumerist behaviors. Overall, I agree with
the prediction although several sensational horror
stories will emerge about poor self-service medical
care choices.
Needs fundamentally new processes that harness the
internet; internet alone is not enough.
A utopian viewpoint! Building such systems may turn
out to be enormously expensive.
Technology itself is never the answer. Technology may
enable these changes, if there is a will to do
so.
The transition will be a very long and bumpy road. I
personally am experiencing one of the bumps. There is
no mechanism for removing medical records from
potential use when they have been proven wrong. Records
that claim I have multiple degenerative and fatal
illnesses have been proven wrong through objective
testing. Because the false records cannot legally be
archived or removed from potential use in some way,
they are used to deny me medical insurance and
employment opportunities.
I don't think it will help with customer service!
And it may only exacerbate the access problems for the
poor. But the readily available information should
certainly marginally improve care.
There will likely be increasing uses of alternatives
although it is not clear how legal these will be. (e.g.
buying medications from foreign sources not necessarily
approved by the FDA.)
It will be very helpful, but not for the reasons
listed above. The main advantage will be for
peer-support and information sharing.
I think the problems of rising costs, poor customer
service and the high prevalence of medical mistakes
have more to do with the consolidation of the medical
industry and the role of pharmaceutical companies and
health insurance companies. I'm not sure how the
internet will address that problem.
Healthcare costs will continue to increase driven by
increased populations, increased population densities,
a belief that illness (due to stress on the body's
total system) can be solved, and that healthcare is
like car mechanics (plug and replace). This is an
arrogant belief.
This is the area in which I see the greatest potential
impact of the Internet.
The increasing use of online resources will actually
exacerbate most of these problems in the short term of
the next decade, since medicine is still on the steep
side of the adoption and learning curve in IT and use
of the Internet in particular. The costs of the IT
investment required by HIPAA alone will add measurably
to health insurance premiums, today and for at least
the next five years. Part of the problem is that, even
though IT and online improvements in these areas are
likely to be beneficial to the very great majority of
consumers, the potential cost of nagging problems or
spectacular single failures is devastatingly high. For
example, if an online pharmaceutical database used by 1
million doctors links even .01% of them to a wrong web
page that results in a serious drug interaction, what
are the potential damages from those 100 errors?
Incalculable. (Although I'm sure the insurance
industry has already done the math...) Medicine online
is inevitable and likely to have many benefits, but
like teaching online, it also has limits and hidden
costs.
Services not requiring physical interaction (e.g. lab
& radiological analysis and some aspects of primary
care and internal medicine) will be removed from
medical centers and outsourced to large specialty
contractors.
This is contrary to the trend of other predictions
which suggest the Internet increases diversity of views
and the selectiveness of seeking information. Medical
quackery is alive and well on the Internet. The health
care system has critical flaws unrelated to the
information highway.
Healthcare is the one area where technology increases
costs rather than decreases. Until drug companies and
the healthcare system change their focus from handling
symptoms of disease to curing disease we will not see
major change to the problems within our healthcare
system.
Most of the problems cannot be solved by the Internet,
but by reorganization of institutions and ending of
absurd U.S. economic model of health care.
The Web will continue to be a useful tool for
information-gathering on health care problems that
people then use in consulting with their doctors or
seeking medical advice, but the evolution will stop
there.
Technology will not fix the broken structure of the
medical and insurance establishment.
The pharmaceutical and insurance and healthcare
industry will feel so threatened that they will put up
even more walls blocking access and use tactics that
question electronic veracity. There will not be
coordination; there will be no way to make corrections
(see TSA's watch list, for instance).
People have the tools to improve their health already.
Most chose McDonalds over the treadmill. The Internet
will only give them access to data they will
ignore.
Medical information will increase, but it will not
eliminate human error, underfunding, and inadequate
resources.
Technology is not a magic bullet for the problems
facing healthcare. In fact, it has actually led to
increases in costs and the extension of life beyond
that which is truly humane. A true solution to the
healthcare crisis is far more messy and more human than
anyone is willing to admit. It will require concessions
by attorneys, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies -
concessions that I doubt will be fully worked out by
2014.
Both the rising healthcare costs and its result, the
lack of access to medical care, are the results of
health becoming a source of profit for investors who
already have money. Nothing inherent in the Web fixes
that. Ditto for poor customer service. There is a
potential gain in the widening of access to medical
specialties for those who have the money - digital
records, easy transmittal of test results and MRIs for
second opinions or consultations, etc. - but the
increasing corporate seizure of what had traditionally
been a private, in-person matter between physician and
patient also brings with it denial of benefits, and
thus of services, that act as a counterweight to those
benefits for far too many Americans, and world
citizens.
Legal Liability is the inhibitor to freedom of
information in healthcare. It always has been. Read
"The Great White Lie" by Bogdanich. It is so
bad, people are not allowed the information to
understand their illnesses much less to manage their
health. The dividing line between doctors and patients
is also liability. Doctors can't give information
because of liability. BIG PHARMA cannot because it is
marketing. We need to deliver information and choices
inside of the point of care. People need tools to
record their data, data visualization so they can
understand trends and the implications of their
choices. Disease State Management is a bureaucratic
joke. If we are ever to empower people in their own
care, we must bridge the
learning/liability/information/telemetry gap in
medicine. We should be empowered with the information
to lower our health care costs by complying with care
instructions and reducing our risk of health problems.
It's simply a question of incentives for CORP, BIG
PHARMA, Insurance, DOC, NURSE and
PATIENT/consumer.
Dead wrong. The healthcare industry has been
remarkably slow in adopting digital technologies
already - and benefit from their resistance by making
it more difficult for patients to understand and
question billing, etc. The industry will continue to
drag its feet for fear of giving up its lucrative
control. Further, medical care is by its very nature
hands-on and there can only be a limited impact by the
Internet.
|