Swimelar publishes article on nationalism and LGBT rights in the Balkans 

Associate Professor of Political Science and coordinator of International and Global Studies Safia Swimelar's recent research looks at the way that nationalism helps explain varying LGBT rights policies in two Southeast European states, Croatia and Serbia.  Her article was published in the peer-reviewed journal East European Politics and Societies.  

At a recent Belgrade (Serbia) Pride Parade, riot police guard marchers and activists, aiming to prevent the kind of violence seen in 2009 and prior years. 
In an article titled "Nationalism and Europeanization in LGBT Rights and Politics: A Comparative Study of Croatia and Serbia," Associate Professor of Political Science and coordinator of International and Global Studies Safia Swimelar examines how nationalism and conceptions of national identity and gender/sexuality norms can be seen as important factors that influence the domestic adoption of LGBT rights, particularly in the postwar Balkans.

 Safia Swimelar, Associate Professor of Political Science and Coordinator of International and Global Studies. 
Homosexuality has often been constructed as a threat to the idea of a unified and stable nation. Croatia and Serbia (from approximately 2000 to 2014) present two interesting and different cases to analyze how nationalist discourse interacts with the concepts of "Europeanness" or European identity, often seen as tied to LGBT rights.  

The article finds that in Croatia, national identity was constructed in terms of convergence with European norms and identity, homonationalism was used to distinguish themselves from a “Balkan” identity, and there was a lower threat perception of the LGBT community framed primarily as a “threat to the family.” In Serbia, state and national identity was constructed in opposition to Europe and homosexuality had stronger threat perception, framed primarily as “threat to the nation.”

The article, published in the peer-reviewed journal East European Politics and Societies, is part of a larger conversation among scholars, policymakers and activists about how LGBT rights change or are resisted in states that are aiming to become part of a larger community, such as the European Union.  This research has relevance for other states where LGBT rights have become politicized by nationalist and/or authoritarian governments.