Designing for Digital Nomads: Human-Centered Strategies for Sustained Connection in the Remote Work Era

 

Ashley Josey

Communication Design, Elon University

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications

Abstract

The rise of remote work has sparked a global shift in how people live, connect, and move through the world. At the forefront of this change is a growing wave of digital nomads – individuals who embrace a location-independent lifestyle, working while traveling from place to place. While nomadism offers freedom and flexibility, it often comes at the cost of lasting relationships and consistent community. This study explores how digital nomads build and sustain social connections, and what kinds of communication tools or systems might better support that process. Using a human-centered design approach, the research analyzed 68 user reflections across five Reddit threads, identifying patterns in connection goals (what people are looking for), social touchpoints (where and how they connect), and barriers (what gets in the way). Key findings highlight the use of improvised strategies to maintain a sense of continuity, including returning to familiar places (“looping”), staying longer in one location, and connecting through shared hobbies and routines. These behaviors reveal unmet needs around emotional sustainability and place-based attachment, pointing to design opportunities within both existing platforms and new tools.

Keywords: digital nomads, remote work, social connections, Reddit, content analysis
Email: ajosey3@elon.edu

I. Introduction

For many, remote work is a convenience. For digital nomads, it’s a gateway to an entirely new way of life. No longer tethered to a single city or office, digital nomads live and work across continents, embracing a lifestyle that trades permanence for possibility. They set up shop in cafe-lined streets in Lisbon, coworking hubs in Bali, and rented flats in Mexico City, seamlessly moving from place to place. Yet, beneath the freedom and flexibility, a paradox emerges: how do you build a sense of belonging when you’re always leaving?

While digital nomads enjoy unprecedented professional autonomy, they also face unique social challenges. Unlike traditional expats or travelers, their mobility disrupts conventional pathways for relationship-building. As nomads cycle through time zones, they’re left to toggle between digital and physical worlds to maintain connection. Prior research has explored several key issues linked with this lifestyle, ranging from personal identity formation (Miguel et al., 2023) to the psychological toll of constant movement (Reichenberger, 2017). However, little attention has been paid to solutions that support meaningful, sustained social connection in transient lifestyles.

This study aims to bridge that gap. By exploring how digital nomads build relationships and integrate into communities, both online and offline, this research will clarify the social needs of this demographic and evaluate the effectiveness of existing communication tools. In turn, these findings will inform actionable insights for reimagining how transient workers connect in ways that foster lasting community, no matter where they are. Applying Human-Centered Design (HCD) principles, the resulting report will deliver data-driven recommendations to help nomads cultivate relationships that endure beyond temporary stays. In a world where work is increasingly untethered, this research strives to shape a future where professional freedom and human connection can boldly coexist.

II. Literature Review

Digital nomadism has evolved from a niche subculture to a recognized alternative to traditional work models, with millions of location-independent professionals leveraging technology to sustain remote careers while traveling. This shift has been facilitated by advancements in digital infrastructure, flexible employment policies, and an increasing desire for autonomy in work-life integration (Cook, 2023). However, digital nomads face unique challenges alongside these freedoms, particularly in forming and maintaining relationships across transient lifestyles.

While existing scholarship explores the economic impact of digital nomadism (Jiwasiddi et al., 2024), the role of technology in identity construction (Miguel et al., 2023), and the lifestyle’s psychological demands (Reichenberger, 2017), fewer studies focus on the social experience of digital nomads. This literature review synthesizes key discussions in the field, establishing the foundation for further inquiry into how digital nomads navigate social connection and community-building in both digital and physical spaces. By identifying patterns, gaps, and tensions in existing research, this review clarifies how a new study can contribute to the conversation with human-centered solutions that support relational continuity for digital nomads.

Many scholars have attempted to define this phenomenon while staying true to its flexible nature. Orel (2023) frames the nomadic lifestyle as a fusion of professional autonomy and personal exploration, with mobility at its core. However, balancing work responsibilities while maintaining a transient lifestyle presents ongoing challenges, from productivity disruptions to financial precarity (Cook, 2023). Reichenberger (2017) further contextualizes this experience, highlighting the psychological demands of constantly adjusting to new environments and the tensions between freedom and stability. Despite its wide range of characterizations, the current scholarship concurs that digital nomadism blurs the traditional boundaries between work and leisure. This unique intersection introduces significant opportunities for research and innovation, laying the foundation for this study.

Building upon previous attempts to define digital nomadism, other research studies explore the role of technology in shaping the dynamics of identity and connection among this lifestyle sector. Some scholars contend that technology plays a dual role in the digital nomad experience. On one hand, digital tools enable professional success, facilitate global mobility, and sustain social networks. On the other hand, digital platforms shape how nomads present themselves and construct their identities, as a constructive force (Cook, 2023). Miguel et al. (2023) found that nomads use social media to emphasize themes of independence and freedom, often curating an idealized version of their lifestyle while omitting the struggles of remote work and social isolation. Similarly, Thompson (2018) critiques how digital communication fosters connection yet reinforces privilege within nomadic circles, potentially limiting cultural integration. These tensions raise questions about the effectiveness of digital platforms in fostering genuine community among nomads.

Another notable research focus in this field involves the relationship between nomads and local communities, characterized as “place-based relationships.” While some may expect that extended stays correlate with closer community bonding, many digital nomads struggle to build relationships with local communities. Miocevic (2025) argues that cooperative interaction between nomads and residents strengthens localized identity and fosters cultural exchange. However, Thompson (2018) highlights that nomads tend to gravitate toward each other, forming insular communities that limit deeper engagement with local cultures. This tendency suggests that while nomads frequently interact with one another, their relationships with local populations remain surface-level, creating an ongoing challenge for community integration.

Continuing the conversation of community interaction, digital nomads contribute to local economies while also reshaping existing social and economic structures. This emerges as a pattern across case studies on digital nomad experiences in global hubs such as Chiang Mai, Bali, and Lisbon. Jiwasiddi et al. (2024) describe how digital nomads influence urban development, creating demand for coworking spaces and remote-friendly accommodations. However, Orel (2023) points out that this influx often leads to gentrification, increasing the cost of living for locals and potentially displacing long-term residents. This research works together to illustrate a narrative in which relationality isn’t just an internal dynamic among digital nomads, but a collective human experience with strong ties to place.

The digital nomad lifestyle also presents unique psychological challenges, particularly regarding emotional stability and social belonging. Reichenberger (2017) notes that while nomads pursue holistic freedom, the realities of constant movement often lead to loneliness, instability, and burnout. Similarly, Miocevic (2025) discusses how the absence of long-term social support structures can negatively impact mental wellbeing, requiring nomads to develop strategies for emotional resilience. Although digital nomads are more connected than ever through online platforms, these tools do not always translate into deep, sustained relationships. This phenomenon can be understood as a sort of modern-day connectivity paradox. Miguel et al. (2023) describe how social media fosters a sense of belonging yet can reinforce feelings of isolation when digital connections remain superficial. Likewise, Thompson (2018) highlights how reliance on digital communication enables transient relationships but lacks the depth of face-to-face interactions. This paradox suggests a need for solutions that bridge the gap between digital connectivity and real-world social belonging.

In further exploring inhibitors to connection in digital nomad lifestyles, a primary challenge for digital nomads is sustaining relationships beyond temporary encounters. Reichenberger (2017) describes how frequent relocation disrupts continuity in friendships, romantic relationships, and professional networks. Orel (2023) further emphasizes that transient living inhibits deep social investment, requiring nomads to continually rebuild their support systems. These insights underscore the need for intentional design strategies that help nomads foster stable and meaningful connections.

While existing scholarship acknowledges these social challenges, few studies explore solutions that are intentionally designed for sustained social integration. This gap highlights the opportunity for UX interventions that support digital nomads in building relationships across both digital and physical environments. A robust body of research highlights the emotional and psychological difficulties of digital nomadism, yet few studies provide concrete solutions. This study will join the conversation here, employing HCD principles of empathy and qualitative research to define key barriers and breakdowns in the relational experiences of modern-day digital nomads. These findings will inform suggestions for bridging the gap between digital tools and real-world belonging, working toward a future of sustained connection in lifestyle contexts defined by frequent relocation.

Altogether, the digital nomad lifestyle represents a fundamental shift in the way people work and engage with the world, yet its social and psychological implications remain underexplored. While existing research addresses economic and technological factors, fewer studies examine the human experience of community-building within transient lifestyles. By synthesizing existing scholarship, this literature review establishes the foundation for new research that leverages UX design strategies to strengthen meaningful relationships in the digital nomad experience. Moving forward, this study will explore how digital platforms and physical spaces can be intentionally designed to promote deeper, more sustainable connections among location-independent workers.

III. Methods

While digital nomadism offers professional flexibility and geographic autonomy, it also disrupts conventional social structures. Without a stable home base, nomads must find new ways to build and sustain relationships, often relying on digital tools and short-term communities to create a sense of belonging. This study seeks to uncover how digital nomads navigate relationships across digital and physical spaces. By identifying barriers to social belonging and evaluating existing communication tools, this research will generate data-driven insights that enhance the social experience of remote workers.

This study is guided by the following questions:

  1. How do digital nomads form and maintain relationships while frequently relocating?
  2. What strategies or obstacles shape their ability to connect with locals and other nomads?
  3. What communication tools, platforms, and strategies might inform design interventions to better support their emotional and relational needs?

These questions build on prior qualitative studies of mobility and community, such as recent research examining how travel influencers engage with both place and digital platforms in global tourism (Ritter, 2024). This study will investigate how digital nomads construct and sustain social networks while leading location-independent lives.

This study used qualitative content analysis to explore how digital nomads navigate connection and belonging in mobile lifestyles. This research context defines a digital nomad as a person who maintains a mobile lifestyle, living and working in multiple locations over time, while relying primarily on digital tools and remote work to sustain their income. This includes both international and domestic movement and allows for a wide range of industries and personal lifestyle rhythms.

Rather than conducting original interviews, the study analyzed user-generated content from r/digitalnomad, a public subreddit with over 2 million members (Reddit, 2022–2024). This community defines digital nomads as “individuals that leverage technology in order to work remotely and live an independent and nomadic lifestyle.” Threads were selected through keyword-based searches on r/digitalnomad using terms such as “loneliness,” “making friends,” “community,” and “relationships.” Posts were chosen if they prompted reflection on emotional connection, social life, or communication challenges while living a mobile lifestyle. To capture depth and variety, the analysis included both original posts and top-level comments with personal experiences or advice. Five threads with high engagement, identified by comment count and upvotes, were selected to gather a range of perspectives across different work styles and travel rhythms.

Following data collection, this study used reflexive thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns in how users experience, sustain, or struggle with connection throughout their nomadic lifestyle. This approach to analysis involved close reading, memoing, and open coding to let themes organically emerge directly from the data (Byrne, 2021). Quotes were grouped across three experience-centered domains inspired by Human-Centered Design (HCD) practice:

  1. Connection Goals – What people are seeking socially
    This includes desires for friendship, community, professional networking, cultural exchange, etc. It reflects their motivations and the emotional or functional needs they hope to fulfill through connection.
  2. Barriers & Breakdowns – What makes connection difficult
    This captures pain points such as emotional fatigue, language/cultural barriers, platform limitations, or burnout from short-term interactions.
  3. Social Touchpoints – Where and how people connect
    This includes platforms (e.g., WhatsApp, Instagram), places (e.g., coworking spaces, hostels), and moments (e.g., weekly meetups, spontaneous encounters) that either enable or inhibit connection.

By coding along these lines, the study stays grounded in the user’s lived experience while also surfacing designable insights – information that can be used to improve tools, services, or spaces for digital nomads. This approach reflects human-centered methods by focusing not only on what people do, but why they do it, how it feels, and what helps or hinders their goals. In line with human-centered design best practices, the final UX recommendations will emphasize small and simple interventions that are empathetic, accessible, and rooted in real-world needs (Interaction Design Foundation, 2021). The goal is not to overhaul the nomadic experience, but to meaningfully enhance the moments that matter most for social connection. These recommendations seek to empower designers, developers, and community builders to advance opportunities for sustained connection within mobile work lifestyles.

IV. Results

This section presents key findings from five discussion threads on the r/digitalnomad subreddit. Each thread begins with a post and branches into layered conversations, where people reflect on their personal experiences of connection, disconnection, and community-building while living a mobile lifestyle. From these discussions, 68 quotes were selected and analyzed through open coding and memoing.

To structure the findings, quotes were grouped into three domains based on recurring social dynamics: Connection Goals (what people are seeking socially), Barriers & Breakdowns (what makes connection difficult), and Social Touchpoints (where and how people connect). These categories reflect not only individual behavior, but also the emotional and structural realities that shape connection on the move. Across these domains, six themes emerged – highlighting the everyday strategies, pain points, and relational gaps that shape the social lives of digital nomads. Quotes are included throughout to center the analysis in lived experience and to surface design opportunities grounded in real-world contexts.

Connection Goals: What People are Seeking Socially

While the freedom of digital nomadism offers new landscapes, new people, and a sense of personal autonomy, many forum contributors expressed a desire for something more rooted – connection that feels mutual, meaningful, and sustained over time. Their reflections suggest that the challenge isn’t just about being alone. It’s about wanting to feel part of something, even in the midst of constant movement.

Theme 1: Seeking Depth in a Shallow System

Across eight quotes, users described wanting more than quick social exchanges – they hoped to build relationships that could carry emotional weight over time. While many accepted that meeting new people was a regular part of nomadic life, they also noted that these interactions often lacked depth. As one person shared:

Most often these are all brief one-off encounters… You’ll cross paths with an awesome fellow traveler or a local for a day or two or a week, and then everyone typically moves on.

This sense of temporary connection led some to pull back emotionally. One contributor asked: “I’ve started wondering, ‘Is it even worth putting any emotional energy into these relationships?’ Should I just treat them as ‘friend for a reason – friend for a season’?”

A few described strategies to build deeper bonds more quickly – such as co-living, group travel, or aligning with people who shared their values – but most framed the lifestyle as one that made sustained connection difficult. Several quotes pointed to the emotional need to be seen and known, rather than simply accompanied for a short stretch of time.

Theme 2: Longing for Belonging

In nine quotes, users went beyond the desire for individual friendships and spoke to a deeper craving for community. They used phrases like “finding your tribe,” “looping back to places that feel like home,” and “wanting to feel part of something.” These reflections weren’t just about avoiding loneliness – they were about building a sense of continuity and shared experience. One person described a simple strategy for building lasting ties: “I try to meet one person in each place I spend a few months in that I will stay in-touch with afterwards. That’s worked well.” Another pointed to the emotional value of returning to familiar destinations: “I kept going back or stay at one location for a few months each year and that’s how we decided to keep in touch probably.”

Others spoke about friendships forming through shared rhythms – reconnecting with Muay Thai training partners in different countries, staying in touch with coworkers across time zones, or chatting regularly with friends met abroad via WhatsApp or Instagram. What emerges is a clear emotional goal: to feel anchored, not just momentarily engaged. Even among people who value independence, there is a strong pull toward forging connections that stick, even when the scenery changes.

Barriers and Breakdowns: What Makes Connection Difficult

Even when digital nomads expressed clarity about the kinds of relationships they wanted to establish – whether that meant community, consistency, or deeper emotional connection – sustaining those ties within a mobile lifestyle proved difficult. Across threads, people pointed to a mix of emotional strain, logistical hurdles, and platform limitations that disrupted their efforts to stay connected. Despite having the intention, and often the tools, many found that building lasting relationships required more than just proximity or availability; it required continuity, which was often the hardest thing to hold onto.

Theme 3: Emotional Fatigue and Withdrawal

In at least 12 quotes across four threads, digital nomads reflected on the quiet emotional weight of continually building relationships from scratch. While some enjoyed the social novelty of nomadic life, others shared how exhausting it became to start over in each new place. One person put it plainly: “There’s almost zero opportunity to build anything of substance if you’re always on the move.” Another described how this cycle led to a kind of protective detachment: “You learn not to get too attached.”

Others raised questions about whether deep relationships were even possible in this lifestyle, suggesting that constant movement doesn’t just challenge connection – it often reshapes what people are willing to hope for. Furthermore, the emotional labor required to form meaningful bonds, knowing they might be temporary, emerged as a recurring pattern. Even digital nomads who valued connection deeply shared that they sometimes pulled back, not from disinterest, but from emotional fatigue. As one person wrote: “It’s not that I don’t want to connect. I just don’t always have the energy to do it again, from the beginning.”

These reflections suggest that burnout doesn’t always appear as social isolation. Sometimes, it shows up as hesitation or in the subtle shift from seeking connection to avoiding disappointment. Instead of actively reaching out, some nomads recalibrated their expectations, settling for lighter, more transactional encounters or relying on digital maintenance rather than emotional investment. Over time, this slow retreat from connection shaped not just behavior, but belief in what kind of relationships were even possible.

Theme 4: The Limits of Digital Platforms

While digital platforms offer connection across distance, many contributors described them as insufficient for building the kinds of relationships they actually wanted. Across six quotes, digital nomads reflected on how communication apps helped them stay in touch, but rarely led to the depth, spontaneity, or emotional presence they were craving. Several described using these tools solely because they were all that was available in the moment, not because they were ideal. One person shared: “For now, I am solving this loneliness by using dating apps. In this way, I have the opportunity to hang out with local people in local places and I can meet people faster.”

This strategy reveals both a strength and a gap: dating apps offer speed and proximity but were rarely mentioned as fostering lasting connection. Instead, people described having to filter or reframe their use of apps like Tinder or Bumble to find platonic company. One person even recommended “using dating apps backward” to avoid unwanted expectations. Another person reflected on the limits of digital contact after parting ways with someone: “After we parted ways, we still keep in touch in chat and video call from time to time… but it’s not really the same.”

The comment points to a common sentiment: even when digital tools maintain a thread of contact, they often fall short in recreating the feeling of being with someone in shared space. Text threads, Instagram stories, and WhatsApp groups may offer continuity, but they rarely provide a sense of presence. Several contributors described feeling more like observers than participants in the lives of their long-distance friends. These adaptations and frustrations suggest a broader issue: the lack of purpose-built platforms for forming and sustaining meaningful, non-romantic relationships while in motion. The limitations here aren’t just about functionality or interface – they shape the emotional tone of the social experience. Without tools designed for friendship, community-building, or long-term peer connection, digital nomads are left to repurpose platforms built for other goals. Over time, this mismatch can narrow expectations of what kinds of relationships are possible while traveling.

Social Touchpoints: Where and How People Connect

While many digital nomads described the emotional and structural challenges of connection, they also shared practical ways they stay socially grounded. These touchpoints included digital platforms, shared hobbies, repeat destinations, and familiar spaces. Social life as a nomad is often built moment by moment through habits, online networks, and small opportunities to overlap with others in daily life.

Theme 5: Looping and Place-Based Rhythms

One of the clearest strategies to emerge from the data was the practice of looping – returning to favorite destinations over time to rejoin friends, reconnect with familiar places, and build relationships that stretch across seasons. This theme showed up in at least 10 quotes across four threads. For many digital nomads, looping wasn’t just a travel habit – it was a way to create social continuity without giving up mobility. One contributor described how recurring visits made it easier to deepen friendships: “Really helps if you initially meet in an attractive destination that you both plan to return to… We often split Airbnbs together, plan excursions, etc.” Another wrote: “Eventually you’ll fall in love with a place and return again and again – that’s when you can add some locals to the mix who will be excited to see you when you return.”

Several people contrasted looping with a nonstop travel style that tends to leave relationships behind. One digital nomad put it bluntly: “Stop nomading in a straight line. If you’re always going somewhere new, you’re abandoning any hope to build substantial relationships on the ground with locals and revisiting nomads and expats.” The same contributor explained why it mattered:

No one is going to invest in a friendship with someone who is about to pick up and leave and never return. Loop back to your favorite places – you will find other nomads who do the same… Then you can truly befriend locals because a friendship is worthwhile to them if you can say ‘see you next season!’

Taken together, these reflections suggest that looping isn’t just about returning to a place you enjoy – it’s a way to make connection feel possible in a lifestyle shaped by impermanence. By circling back to familiar people and places, digital nomads create a kind of rhythm that allows relationships to grow over time, even without staying in one place for long.

Theme 6: Shared Hobbies and Hybrid Communities

While some digital nomads relied on geographic familiarity to foster connection, others pointed to shared activities and interest-based spaces – both online and offline – as social anchors. Across at least 12 quotes, contributors described how hobbies, fitness routines, and digital communities helped them build or maintain friendships that felt more natural and sustained. One person wrote:

My anchor community is definitely Muay Thai, and I’ve reconnected with 3 separate friends I trained with in Mexico since landing in Thailand… I know a half dozen more who are scattered across different cities in Thailand right now that I plan to visit.

Others echoed this pattern, describing friendships formed through surfing, yoga, CrossFit, or martial arts – routines that were both portable and place-based. These repeated activities gave structure to social life, offering shared context and regular encounters that made connection feel less forced. Digital communities also played a meaningful role, especially those built around shared identity, values, or work rhythms. One contributor shared:

There are some groups for women travelers where you can hang out digitally as well as in person. I’m part of Digital Nomad Girls, which focuses on navigating remote work, and I’ve loved having the community.

For people who didn’t feel at home on mainstream social media, these niche networks offered an alternative – a space to stay connected without having to start over in every new place. These hybrid communities allowed a sense of belonging to travel with them, moving fluidly across borders, time zones, and life phases. Together, these examples suggest that connection isn’t just about meeting new people – it’s about building shared patterns that create familiarity. Whether through looping, hobbies, or hybrid groups, digital nomads often found that relationships grew stronger not through novelty, but through return.

V. Discussion

The results of this study suggest that the biggest barrier to connection for digital nomads is not lack of opportunity, but lack of continuity. Nomads aren’t just searching for new people to meet – they’re trying to carry relationships forward through a context of constant change. What makes that difficult is not only their own mobility, but the way many platforms, routines, and environments are designed for brief encounters rather than long-term familiarity.

This echoes themes in the existing literature. As Reichenberger (2017) notes, the psychological toll of digital nomadism often stems from the absence of lasting relational structures. While tools like social media or dating apps promise connection, they rarely deliver the kind of grounded belonging that many people are seeking. Miguel et al. (2023) found that nomads often curate idealized identities on digital platforms, yet these same platforms do little to help build the depth or mutuality that define meaningful connection. Similarly, Thompson (2018) argued that while digital nomads often build global social networks, these tend to be “light” ties – productive but emotionally thin. This study affirms those insights, but also points toward practical, designable strategies digital nomads already use to resist that thinness.

Rather than inventing new ways to connect, many nomads are repurposing their routines: staying longer in one place, returning to cities they already know, and building friendships through shared activities. These strategies aren’t often supported by the tools they use. Based on the patterns that emerged in this study, four design directions stand out as particularly useful for bridging the gap between mobility and sustained connection.

Design Intervention #1: Support Longer Stays with Continuity-Focused Features

Many digital nomads emphasized the value of staying in one place for a month or more. These longer stays allowed for deeper conversations, overlapping routines, and a sense of familiarity with both people and place. Yet most digital tools treat nomadic life as a sequence of short-term stops – optimizing for quick connections, one-time events, or rapid discovery. To better support sustained social connection, platforms could introduce features specifically geared toward long-stay travelers. These might include:

  • Filters or tags for stay duration, allowing nomads to connect with others planning to remain in a city for several weeks or months.
  • Recurring event suggestions that match the cadence of longer stays, such as weekly meetups or local hobby groups.
  • Location memory tools that surface past connections when someone returns to a familiar city, including contact prompts or activity history.

These features would shift platform design from a focus on short-term presence to patterns of return and duration. Rather than assuming each city is a clean slate, tools could highlight opportunities to deepen existing relationships or build new ones around shared timelines. This aligns with findings from Jiwasiddi et al. (2024), who argue that long-stay nomads in destinations like Chiang Mai often develop more grounded ties with both locals and fellow travelers. By reflecting the slower social pacing that often fosters belonging, digital platforms can help nomads feel less like visitors and more like active participants in the communities they move through.

Design Intervention #2: Surface Shared Routines Through Interest-Based Discovery

Many digital nomads described forming friendships not through introductions or bios, but through repeated overlap in daily life – working from the same cafes, attending group workouts, joining dance classes, or taking part in weekend excursions. These routines served as informal anchors for social life, offering consistency and shared context even in unfamiliar cities. However, most social tools prioritize identity over routine. For example, asking users to describe themselves, rather than highlighting how and where they actually show up. To better reflect how connection happens on the ground, platforms could introduce features that surface shared patterns of behavior. For example:

  • Routine-based discovery, where people can indicate which spaces or events they regularly attend (e.g., “Monday yoga,” “coworking here downtown,” “Tuesday market meetup”).
  • Community clustering, which shows groups of people who frequent similar places or activities over time.
  • Social calendar overlays, allowing travelers to coordinate based on recurring schedules rather than one-off events.

These features would help digital nomads discover others not just based on common interests, but on shared rhythms, making it easier to build familiarity through regular, low-pressure interactions. This approach builds on Lee et al. (2019), who emphasized the role of social infrastructure in sustaining community, arguing that relationships are often formed not through deep intentionality, but through casual, repeat presence. By designing with these shared routines in mind, platforms can help digital nomads form bonds that feel organic, not forced.

Design Intervention #3: Surface Social Patterns Through Looping

One of the most reliable strategies for sustaining relationships among digital nomads was the practice of looping – returning to familiar cities over time. These return visits allowed people to reconnect with friends, local communities, and places that already held meaning. Despite its frequency, this behavior is largely unsupported by existing platforms, which tend to treat travel as linear and disconnected. To reflect how social continuity often emerges through place-based rhythm, platforms could include features such as:

  • Favorite cities, where people can mark locations they return to frequently.
  • Reconnection alerts, notifying users when a previous contact is back in the same place.
  • Loop detection tools, which surface overlapping return patterns to help nomads identify others with similar seasonal rhythms.

These features would help nomads re-engage with existing relationships, rather than starting from scratch each time they arrive somewhere new. By treating place as relational memory, not just a pin on a map, design can support continuity without requiring people to remain static.

Design Intervention #4: Support Fluid Connection Through Hybrid Communities

Some of the strongest relationships described in this study came from hybrid communities – groups that blended digital connection with real-world overlap. Slack channels, niche Facebook groups, and co-living networks offered a flexible sense of belonging that could travel with people across cities and time zones. To support this model, platforms could offer tools that maintain light, low-pressure continuity, such as:

  • Nearby dashboards, showing who from your network is currently in the same city.
  • Reconnection prompts, offering nudges to re-engage people you’ve met before.
  • Shared event threads, where group chats or meetups are organized around common interests and travel rhythms.

These interventions wouldn’t require building entirely new platforms. Instead, they would help people carry existing communities with them, reducing the fatigue of always rebuilding. In a lifestyle shaped by movement, even small reminders or points of overlap can help people feel more connected over time.

Designing With (Not Around) the Nomad Experience

Together, these findings highlight a shift in how we think about connection. Most digital tools prioritize access, speed, and discovery. But for many nomads, the real challenge is not meeting people – it’s staying connected once the initial moment has passed. What’s missing is not functionality, but rhythm. As reflected across user responses, the most meaningful relationships often came from return: returning to places, routines, or people. Platforms that support relational continuity don’t need to be elaborate. They just need to make that return visible. Whether through shared travel loops, interest-based clustering, or hybrid community design, small, human-centered changes can help nomads feel less like they’re always starting over. Designing for digital nomads means acknowledging that freedom and connection don’t have to be in conflict. With intentional communication and the right tools, they can coexist.

VI. Conclusion

This study explored how digital nomads navigate social connection while living in motion. Through qualitative coding of 68 Reddit reflections, the results suggest that while many nomads value flexibility, they are also seeking continuity, hoping to remain connected to people, places, and communities over time. The challenge is not necessarily in meeting others, but in sustaining depth and familiarity in a lifestyle shaped by constant movement. To manage this tension, many digital nomads rely on quiet, personal strategies: looping back to familiar cities, forming friendships through shared routines, or staying connected through hybrid communities that blend online and in-person connection. These findings point to a broader need for communication tools that help people establish rhythms of return in relationships that matter.

As with any research, this study has its limitations. The data was drawn entirely from public Reddit threads, reflecting a self-selected group of contributors – primarily English-speaking, tech-savvy individuals comfortable sharing online. Without demographic context, it is difficult to assess how identity, privilege, or cultural background may influence different experiences of connection. Still, the responses offer a valuable entry point into the emotional and relational dimensions of mobile work life. Future research could track how relationships evolve over time and across different travel phases, or test lightweight design interventions that help nomads stay visible to each other and reconnect in familiar places. While digital nomadism enables casual connection, this study surfaces what it takes to support something more lasting: relationships that continue, even as everything else shifts.

Acknowledgements

This article wouldn’t exist without an incredible constellation of people who shaped it along the way. I’m especially grateful to Professors Philip Motley and Qian Xu for fostering my spark for human-centered design, and to Professor Harlen Makemson for guiding me through every step of the research journey. I also owe thanks to my family for being constant inspirations: my dad, Steve, for teaching me how to stay curious about life, and my sister Savannah — my favorite nomad and forever muse.

References

Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Cook, D. (2023). What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2023.2190608

Interaction Design Foundation – IxDF. (2021, June 14). What is human-centered design (HCD)? Interaction Design Foundation – IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/human-centered-design

Jiwasiddi, A., Schlagwein, D., Cahalane, M., Cecez, K. D., Leong, C., & Ractham, P. (2024). Digital nomadism as a new part of the visitor economy: The case of the “digital nomad capital” Chiang Mai, Thailand. Information Systems Journal, 34(5), 1493–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12496

Lee, A., Toombs, A. L., Erickson, I., Nemer, D., Ho, Y., Jo, E., & Guo, Z. (2019). The social infrastructure of co-spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359244

Miguel, C., Lutz, C., Majetić, F., & Perez-Vega, R. (2023). Working from paradise? An analysis of the representation of digital nomads’ values and lifestyle on Instagram. New Media & Society, 27(4), 2230-2252. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231205892

Miocevic, D. (2025). Baby come back: Resident-digital nomad conflicts, destination identification, and revisit intention. Journal of Travel Research, 64(3), 696–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231220945

Orel, M. (2023). Wanderlust workforce: a journey into understanding digital nomadism. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2023.2210017

Reddit. (2022, July 8). These apps saved my digital nomad life. What are yours? [Online forum post]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/comments/vomj5c/these_apps_saved_my_digital_nomad_life_what_are/

Reddit. (2023, January 31). How do you find like-minded friends while traveling as a digital nomad? [Online forum post]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/comments/10pdix8/how_do_you_find_likeminded_friends_while/

Reddit. (2023, November 10). How do you deal with the loneliness of it? [Online forum post]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/comments/17jt9ru/how_do_you_deal_with_the_loneliness_of_it/

Reddit. (2024, February 26). Longtime digital nomads: Have you ever made a lasting friendship while DNing? [Online forum post]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/comments/1b0y3xs/longtime_digital_nomads_have_you_ever_made_a/

Reddit. (2024, April 13). Maintaining a social circle as a digital nomad [Online forum post]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/comments/1jzyhgs/maintaining_a_social_circle_as_a_digital_nomad/

Reddit. (n.d.). r/digitalnomad [Online forum]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/

Reichenberger, I. (2017). Digital nomads – a quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 21(3), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2017.1358098

Ritter, C. S. (2024). Locating the influencer: Place and platform in global tourism. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781802625974

Thompson, B.Y. (2018). The digital nomad lifestyle: (Remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-018-00030-y